0.03/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.03/0.12	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.12/0.33	% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
0.12/0.33	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.12/0.33	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.12/0.33	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.12/0.33	% CPULimit   : 960
0.12/0.33	% WCLimit    : 120
0.12/0.33	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 04:57:20 EDT 2022
0.12/0.33	% CPUTime    : 
0.17/0.45	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.17/0.45	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.17/0.45	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting full_lambda_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# post_as_ho11 with pid 9568 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by post_as_ho11
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF22-SHSSMSBN
0.17/0.47	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSS22-SHSSMSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# new_ho_10 with pid 9573 completed with status 0
0.17/0.47	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLSNHSN.
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 600s (5) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho3 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Starting post_as_ho11 with 120s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# No SInE strategy applied
0.17/0.47	# Search class: HGUNF-FFSF22-SHSSMSBN
0.17/0.47	# partial match(1): HGUNF-FFSS22-SHSSMSBN
0.17/0.47	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.17/0.47	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.17/0.47	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.17/0.47	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# Proof found!
0.17/0.47	# SZS status Theorem
0.17/0.47	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_22, type, current_world: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_23, type, prop_a: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_24, type, prop_b: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_25, type, prop_c: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_26, type, mfalse: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_27, type, mtrue: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_28, type, mnot: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_29, type, mor: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_30, type, mand: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_31, type, mimpl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_32, type, miff: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_33, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_34, type, mdia: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_35, type, mall: (individuals > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_36, type, mexists: (individuals > $i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_37, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_38, type, msatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_39, type, mcountersatisfiable: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_40, type, minvalid: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_41, type, rel: $i > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_42, type, icl_atom: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_43, type, icl_princ: ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_44, type, icl_and: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_45, type, icl_or: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_46, type, icl_impl: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_47, type, icl_true: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_48, type, icl_false: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_49, type, icl_says: ($i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_50, type, iclval: ($i > $o) > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_51, type, admin: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_52, type, bob: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_53, type, deletefile1: $i > $o).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_54, type, esk1_2: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_55, type, esk2_2: ($i > $o) > $i > $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_56, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(decl_57, type, esk4_0: $i).
0.17/0.47	thf(mimpl, axiom, ((mimpl)=(^[X7:$i > $o, X8:$i > $o]:(mor @ (mnot @ X7) @ X8))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mimpl)).
0.17/0.47	thf(mnot, axiom, ((mnot)=(^[X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(~((X2 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mnot)).
0.17/0.47	thf(mor, axiom, ((mor)=(^[X4:$i > $o, X5:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((X4 @ X3)|(X5 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mor)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_atom, axiom, ((icl_atom)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_atom)).
0.17/0.47	thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X10:$i > $i > $o, X11:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(![X12:$i]:(((X10 @ X1 @ X12)=>(X11 @ X12)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mbox)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_impl, axiom, ((icl_impl)=(^[X19:$i > $o, X20:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ (mimpl @ X19 @ X20)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_impl)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_says, axiom, ((icl_says)=(^[X19:$i > $o, X21:$i > $o]:(mbox @ rel @ (mor @ X19 @ X21)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_says)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_s4_valid, axiom, ((iclval)=(^[X22:$i > $o]:((mvalid @ X22)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_s4_valid)).
0.17/0.47	thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:((X11 @ X15))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mvalid)).
0.17/0.47	thf(mfalse, axiom, ((mfalse)=(^[X1:$i]:(~($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL008^0.ax', mfalse)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_princ, axiom, ((icl_princ)=(^[X11:$i > $o]:(X11))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_princ)).
0.17/0.47	thf(icl_false, axiom, ((icl_false)=(^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^0.ax', icl_false)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax2, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ admin) @ (icl_says @ (icl_impl @ (icl_princ @ bob) @ (icl_princ @ admin)) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax2)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax1, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_impl @ (icl_princ @ admin) @ icl_false) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax1)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ax3, axiom, (iclval @ (icl_says @ (icl_princ @ bob) @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax3)).
0.17/0.47	thf(ex3, conjecture, (iclval @ (icl_atom @ deletefile1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ex3)).
0.17/0.47	thf(refl_axiom, axiom, ![X19:$i > $o]:((mvalid @ (mimpl @ (mbox @ rel @ X19) @ X19))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SWV008^1.ax', refl_axiom)).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_17, plain, ((mimpl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mimpl])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_18, plain, ((mnot)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(~((Z0 @ Z1))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mnot])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_19, plain, ((mor)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2)|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mor])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((icl_atom)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X25:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X25)=>(Z0 @ X25)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_atom])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_21, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X12:$i]:(((Z0 @ Z2 @ X12)=>(Z1 @ X12)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_22, plain, ((icl_impl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X26:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X26)=>(((~((Z0 @ X26)))|(Z1 @ X26)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_impl])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_23, plain, ((mimpl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(((~((Z0 @ Z2)))|(Z1 @ Z2))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((icl_says)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X27:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X27)=>(((Z0 @ X27)|(Z1 @ X27)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_says])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_25, plain, ((iclval)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((![X28:$i]:((Z0 @ X28)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_s4_valid])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_26, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(![X15:$i]:((Z0 @ X15))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_27, plain, ((mfalse)=(^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mfalse])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_28, plain, ((icl_atom)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i]:(![X25:$i]:(((rel @ Z1 @ X25)=>(Z0 @ X25)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_29, plain, ((icl_princ)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:(Z0))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[icl_princ])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_30, plain, ((icl_impl)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X26:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X26)=>(((~((Z0 @ X26)))|(Z1 @ X26)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_21])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_31, plain, ((icl_says)=(^[Z0:$i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X27:$i]:(((rel @ Z2 @ X27)=>(((Z0 @ X27)|(Z1 @ X27)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_19]), c_0_21])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_32, plain, ((iclval)=(^[Z0:$i > $o]:((![X28:$i]:((Z0 @ X28)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_33, axiom, ((icl_false)=(^[Z0:$i]:(~($true)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[icl_false, c_0_27])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_34, plain, ![X48:$i, X47:$i]:(((rel @ X48 @ X47)=>((admin @ X47)|![X46:$i]:(((rel @ X47 @ X46)=>(![X44:$i]:(((rel @ X46 @ X44)=>(~(bob @ X44)|(admin @ X44))))|![X45:$i]:(((rel @ X46 @ X45)=>(deletefile1 @ X45))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax2, c_0_28]), c_0_29]), c_0_30]), c_0_31]), c_0_32])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_35, plain, ![X38:$i, X37:$i]:(((rel @ X38 @ X37)=>(![X35:$i]:(((rel @ X37 @ X35)=>~(admin @ X35)))|![X36:$i]:(((rel @ X37 @ X36)=>(deletefile1 @ X36)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax1, c_0_28]), c_0_29]), c_0_30]), c_0_33]), c_0_31]), c_0_32])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_36, plain, ![X43:$i, X42:$i]:(((rel @ X43 @ X42)=>((bob @ X42)|![X41:$i]:(((rel @ X42 @ X41)=>(deletefile1 @ X41)))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[ax3, c_0_28]), c_0_29]), c_0_31]), c_0_32])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ~(![X40:$i, X39:$i]:(((rel @ X40 @ X39)=>(deletefile1 @ X39)))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[ex3]), c_0_28]), c_0_32])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_38, plain, ![X19:$i > $o, X30:$i]:((~(![X29:$i]:(((rel @ X30 @ X29)=>(X19 @ X29))))|(X19 @ X30))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[refl_axiom, c_0_23]), c_0_21]), c_0_26])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_39, plain, ![X66:$i, X67:$i, X68:$i, X69:$i, X70:$i]:((~(rel @ X66 @ X67)|((admin @ X67)|(~(rel @ X67 @ X68)|(~(rel @ X68 @ X69)|(~(bob @ X69)|(admin @ X69))|(~(rel @ X68 @ X70)|(deletefile1 @ X70))))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_34])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_40, plain, ![X57:$i, X58:$i, X59:$i, X60:$i]:((~(rel @ X57 @ X58)|(~(rel @ X58 @ X59)|~(admin @ X59)|(~(rel @ X58 @ X60)|(deletefile1 @ X60))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_41, plain, ![X63:$i, X64:$i, X65:$i]:((~(rel @ X63 @ X64)|((bob @ X64)|(~(rel @ X64 @ X65)|(deletefile1 @ X65))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_36])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ((rel @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0)&~(deletefile1 @ esk4_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_43, plain, ![X49:$i > $o, X50:$i]:((((rel @ X50 @ (esk1_2 @ X49 @ X50))|(X49 @ X50))&(~(X49 @ (esk1_2 @ X49 @ X50))|(X49 @ X50)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_38])])])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_44, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X13:$i, X12:$i, X15:$i]:(((admin @ X3)|(admin @ X13)|(deletefile1 @ X15)|~((rel @ X1 @ X3))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X12 @ X13))|~((bob @ X13))|~((rel @ X12 @ X15)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_45, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X12:$i, X13:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X13)|~((rel @ X1 @ X3))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((admin @ X12))|~((rel @ X3 @ X13)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_46, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X12:$i]:(((bob @ X3)|(deletefile1 @ X12)|~((rel @ X1 @ X3))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, (rel @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ~((deletefile1 @ esk4_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_42])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_49, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((X2 @ X1)|~((X2 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_50, plain, ![X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((rel @ X1 @ (esk1_2 @ X2 @ X1))|(X2 @ X1))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_51, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X12:$i, X15:$i, X13:$i]:(((deletefile1 @ X1)|(admin @ X3)|~((rel @ X12 @ X1))|~((rel @ X12 @ X13))|~((rel @ X3 @ X12))|~((rel @ X15 @ X3))|~((bob @ X13)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_52, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((bob @ esk3_0)|~((rel @ X1 @ esk3_0)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46, c_0_47]), c_0_48])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_53, plain, ![X1:$i]:((rel @ X1 @ X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49, c_0_50])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_54, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:((~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X1))|~((rel @ X3 @ esk3_0))|~((admin @ X1)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_47]), c_0_48])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_55, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X12:$i, X3:$i]:(((admin @ X1)|~((rel @ esk3_0 @ X3))|~((rel @ X1 @ esk3_0))|~((rel @ X12 @ X1))|~((bob @ X3)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51, c_0_47]), c_0_48])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_56, negated_conjecture, (bob @ esk3_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_52, c_0_53])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_57, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((~((rel @ X1 @ esk3_0))|~((admin @ esk3_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54, c_0_53])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_58, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((admin @ X1)|~((rel @ X1 @ esk3_0))|~((rel @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55, c_0_53]), c_0_56])])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_59, negated_conjecture, ~((admin @ esk3_0)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57, c_0_53])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_60, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(~((rel @ X1 @ esk3_0))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58, c_0_53]), c_0_59])).
0.17/0.47	thf(c_0_61, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60, c_0_53]), ['proof']).
0.17/0.47	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.17/0.47	# Parsed axioms                        : 63
0.17/0.47	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses                      : 42
0.17/0.47	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 33
0.17/0.47	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
0.17/0.47	# Processed clauses                    : 47
0.17/0.47	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.17/0.47	# ...subsumed                          : 2
0.17/0.47	# ...remaining for further processing  : 44
0.17/0.47	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.17/0.47	# Backward-subsumed                    : 11
0.17/0.47	# Backward-rewritten                   : 1
0.17/0.47	# Generated clauses                    : 66
0.17/0.47	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 63
0.17/0.47	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.17/0.47	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.17/0.47	# Paramodulations                      : 66
0.17/0.47	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.17/0.47	# NegExts                              : 0
0.17/0.47	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.17/0.47	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.17/0.47	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.17/0.47	# Current number of processed clauses  : 23
0.17/0.47	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.17/0.47	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.17/0.47	#    Negative unit clauses             : 4
0.17/0.47	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 15
0.17/0.47	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
0.17/0.47	# ...number of literals in the above   : 153
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.17/0.47	# Current number of archived clauses   : 21
0.17/0.47	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 134
0.17/0.47	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 49
0.17/0.47	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
0.17/0.47	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
0.17/0.47	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
0.17/0.47	# BW rewrite match successes           : 1
0.17/0.47	# Condensation attempts                : 47
0.17/0.47	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.17/0.47	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 4269
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.009 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.000 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
0.17/0.47	
0.17/0.47	# -------------------------------------------------
0.17/0.47	# User time                : 0.011 s
0.17/0.47	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.17/0.47	# Total time               : 0.013 s
0.17/0.47	# Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
0.17/0.47	EOF